Biometrics in Financial Apps: Is Your Face Really a Password?
- Ariel Calderon Solis
- 2 days ago
- 5 min read
Biometrics make it incredibly easy to open a banking or budgeting app in seconds. But convenience can create a false sense of safety, especially when money is involved.
Here’s the honest truth:
Biometrics are often very secure on modern phones, but they are not a magical shield. They work best as part of a layered setup that includes a strong device passcode and extra verification for sensitive actions.
Below are the most common myths people believe about biometric login in financial apps, and what’s actually true.
Myth #1: “Face ID is just a photo of my face.”
Fact: Biometrics use a secure template, not your actual photo.
When you enable Face ID or fingerprint unlock, your phone creates a mathematical representation (a “template”) that helps it recognize you. The goal is to avoid storing an actual image that could be reused elsewhere.
On modern devices, that biometric template is designed to stay on your device and be protected by hardware security.
Myth #2: “If my banking app uses Face ID, it’s basically unhackable.”
Fact: Biometrics are strong, but your real foundation is your device passcode.
Most financial apps use biometrics as a fast way to “unlock” access that’s already allowed on your device.
In plain terms:
If someone can’t unlock your phone, they’re much less likely to get into your financial apps.
If your phone is easy to unlock (weak passcode, stolen while unlocked, etc.), biometrics alone won’t save you.
A strong passcode is still the core protection underneath biometric unlock.
Myth #3: “Someone can unlock my phone with a screenshot or a random selfie.”
Fact: Modern systems are designed to resist simple photo attacks.
On many modern smartphones, biometric unlock uses depth or other liveness signals and is designed to resist basic “photo” spoofing attempts. Systems also enforce lockouts after repeated failures.
For example, Apple notes the probability that a random person could unlock a device with Face ID is less than 1 in 1,000,000 (with a single enrolled appearance). Apple also notes the probability is higher for twins/siblings who look alike and for children under 13.
The practical takeaway:
Simple “use a photo” attacks generally aren’t the main risk on modern devices.
Real-world risk tends to be theft + weak passcode, or social engineering.
Myth #4: “Biometrics are always safer than a password.”
Fact: They’re safer than reused passwords, but different from a strong passcode.
A common danger with passwords is reuse. If one site leaks your password and you reuse it elsewhere, attackers can try it across many accounts.
Biometrics don’t work like that. Your face can’t be “reused” across websites the way passwords can.
But biometrics also have limitations:
You can’t “change your face” the way you can reset a password.
Biometrics can be easier to force under physical pressure than a memorized passcode.
So a better comparison is:
Biometrics vs reused passwords: biometrics often win.
Biometrics vs strong device passcode: use both, and prefer the passcode for high-risk moments.
Myth #5: “If I’m sleeping, Face ID will unlock anyway.”
Fact: Some systems try to confirm your attention.
Apple notes Face ID is attention-aware and checks whether your eyes are open and attention is directed at the device (this behavior can vary depending on settings and accessibility needs).
Even if you trust attention checks, the safer mindset is:
Treat biometrics as “convenience,” not “final authority,” for financial actions.
Myth #6: “Android face unlock is the same as iPhone Face ID.”
Fact: Biometric strength varies by device and implementation.
Not all “face unlock” or fingerprint systems are equal. Some devices use stronger hardware and stricter security constraints than others.
Android’s platform documentation describes biometrics as a convenient but potentially less secure option than primary authentication (PIN/pattern/password), and it also defines classes of biometric strength with different constraints and privileges.
The practical takeaway:
Treat biometrics as a convenience layer.
Use a strong device passcode underneath.
Don’t assume every device’s “face unlock” offers the same level of protection.
Myth #7: “Deepfakes mean Face ID is useless now.”
Fact: Deepfakes are a bigger risk for remote identity checks than for on-device unlock.
Deepfakes are a real concern, especially for:
selfie-based KYC (identity verification)
social engineering scams
But phone biometrics are typically designed as an on-device check with hardware protections and anti-spoofing measures.
The practical takeaway:
Deepfake headlines shouldn’t automatically make you disable biometrics.
You should be more cautious when an app asks for a selfie to “verify your identity,” especially if the request is unexpected.
Myth #8: “If my phone gets stolen, Face ID will protect me.”
Fact: Theft scenarios depend on whether the attacker can get past your passcode.
If your phone is stolen while locked and your passcode is strong, that’s a good situation.
But if:
someone watched you enter a weak passcode, or
your phone was stolen while unlocked, or
you use an easy-to-guess passcode
…then biometrics may not be enough.
This is where your habits matter more than the biometric feature itself.
5-minute checklist (do this today)
Use a strong device passcode
Avoid 4-digit PINs.
Don’t use birthdays or repeating patterns.
Enable biometrics for convenience, not as your only control
Great for opening the app quickly.
Turn on extra verification for money-moving actions
Transfers, new payees, changing your email/phone.
Hide sensitive notifications on the lock screen
Don’t display balances, one-time codes, or transaction previews when locked.
Know how to quickly disable biometrics on your phone
Learn your device’s emergency or lock-down shortcut.
Biometrics in Financial Apps: What should a financial app require for sensitive actions?
Even if biometrics are enabled for login, a strong pattern is “step-up verification” for high-risk actions.
Examples:
confirm with device passcode + MFA for transfers
require re-authentication for changing security settings
add time-based limits and alerts for new payees
This is exactly why robust authentication strategies often combine biometrics, MFA, and secure encryption practices.
Related reading:
FAQ
Is Face ID safer than a fingerprint?
Both can be very secure. The real difference in practice is your device + settings + passcode strength.
Can someone unlock my phone with a photo?
Modern systems are designed to resist simple photo attacks. The bigger risk is theft + weak passcode or social engineering.
Should I disable biometrics in my banking app?
Not necessarily. For most people, biometrics + strong passcode is a good setup, just don’t rely on biometrics alone for high-risk actions.
What should I do if my phone is stolen?
Immediately use your platform’s “lost device” tools, change passwords for critical accounts (email first), and contact your bank.
Conclusion
Biometrics are a powerful convenience layer, and on modern devices, they can be extremely secure. But they’re not a perfect replacement for a strong passcode, and they shouldn’t be the only gatekeeper for sensitive financial actions.
If you want a deeper look at how fintech apps combine biometrics, MFA, and encryption to protect users, you can also read:
Comments